Nature images

Forums All About Photography Nature images

This topic contains 3 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Tom Seaton Tom Seaton 2 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
  • #9580
    Profile photo of wbaxter

    Go to

    <big><big><b><span style=”font-size: 16pt; font-family: ‘Calibri’,’sans-serif’; color: #002060;”><big>Smithsonian’s “Wilderness Forever” Photo Contest</big></span></b></big></big><b><span style=”font-size: 16pt; font-family: ‘Calibri’,’sans-serif’; color: #002060;”><big><big>

    Profile photo of meg cumming
    meg cumming

    Makes you want to weep doesn’t it Wallace? They are beautiful and something that we can aspire to.

    Profile photo of Ian McNab
    Ian McNab

    Not sure they’d be OK under FIAP rules, Wallace – do they seem to be fairly heftily processed to you?

    Profile photo of Tom Seaton
    Tom Seaton

    I’m with you Ian, they are startling rather than stunning Nature images – highly processed to make them appear so

    and nothing really wrong with that but not as competition work or, more critically, as representations of ‘natural nature’.

    In that respect less admirable than anything Bob, Paul, Ian, the Hills etc. produce every season.

    But nice to look at and try to work out how they were done!

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.