Nature images

Forums All About Photography Nature images

This topic contains 3 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Tom Seaton Tom Seaton 2 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9580
    Profile photo of wbaxter
    wbaxter
    Participant

    Go to

    <big><big><b><span style=”font-size: 16pt; font-family: ‘Calibri’,’sans-serif’; color: #002060;”><big>Smithsonian’s “Wilderness Forever” Photo Contest</big></span></b></big></big><b><span style=”font-size: 16pt; font-family: ‘Calibri’,’sans-serif’; color: #002060;”><big><big>
    </big></big></span></b>

    #9581
    Profile photo of meg cumming
    meg cumming
    Participant

    Makes you want to weep doesn’t it Wallace? They are beautiful and something that we can aspire to.

    #9582
    Profile photo of Ian McNab
    Ian McNab
    Keymaster

    Not sure they’d be OK under FIAP rules, Wallace – do they seem to be fairly heftily processed to you?

    #9588
    Profile photo of Tom Seaton
    Tom Seaton
    Participant

    I’m with you Ian, they are startling rather than stunning Nature images – highly processed to make them appear so

    and nothing really wrong with that but not as competition work or, more critically, as representations of ‘natural nature’.

    In that respect less admirable than anything Bob, Paul, Ian, the Hills etc. produce every season.

    But nice to look at and try to work out how they were done!

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.