Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 736 through 740 (of 740 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #929
    Profile photo of John Royle
    ajroyle
    Keymaster

    Adi (Eddy) Sethna’s article is well known to recently qualified judges since it is used at the L&CPU Judging Seminar.

    Adi was a psychiatrist and so had a methodical approach to the process which really takes you somewhere (in what can be a very vague subject) and his writing has certainly been a big influence on my approach to judging.

    In Brian’s article he is expressing concern at the narrow approach some judges exhibited to the work. This doesn’t always mean a descent into technical nit-picking. His judges were failing to bring an open mind (not even necessarily an informed mind) to judging the pictures.

    But what do we really ask of our judges? I heard one national (and well respected) judge say that she could sit all day and mark pictures but couldn’t do what the club judge does – stand up and talk about the picture to an audience. In the end this is what we want, people who can explain why a picture works in a convincing and compelling way. Think about the judges we have – they usually get invited back because they can do this. The marking we know is a questionable thing anyway – very subjective.

    BTW do you know that many clubs do not ask for a mark out of 20? Many only ask for things like 1,2,3, Highly Commended and Commended. The rest (and that could be, say, 60 pictures in our case) only get a comment – no mark. Should we be doing that?

     

    #877
    Profile photo of John Royle
    ajroyle
    Keymaster

    That commentary should really be added to Brian’s article, it elucidates the issue beautifully.

    I worry that club photography does get obcessed sometimes with the pursuit of perfection of the image in a technical sense. I liken it to woodwork where the perfect execution of the joints overrules the overall look, aesthetics and  utility of the piece of furniture.

    Many of my favourite photographs I fear might not do well in a typical club competition.

    Is this encapsulated in the difference between the RPS and PAGB distinctions? In the former your work is viewed as a panel – and that panel can have a very broad means of expression (even mixed media) – in the latter your images are judged individually using more or less “club” criteria.

    In defense of club photography, it does teach you how to give your work more impact and deliver its message more clearly and make it more “attractive” (even beautiful). It is also a community where we help each other achieve. But let’s not take a narrow view of the work. 

     

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Profile photo of John Royle ajroyle.
    #830
    Profile photo of John Royle
    ajroyle
    Keymaster

    Thanks Ken, It gave us a different view of the Olympics didn’t it. Let’s hope it also encourages members to have a go at presenting. Well done Sharon.

    #829
    Profile photo of John Royle
    ajroyle
    Keymaster

    Hi Ken,

    Since the file size is restricted to 512K it is unlikely you could upload a 7×5 image.

    Perhaps you could email it to me and I’ll pass it on to Delores.

     

    Thanks for the thought, Ken and thanks for posting.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by Profile photo of John Royle ajroyle.
    #773
    Profile photo of John Royle
    ajroyle
    Keymaster

    Lovely little camera but the fixed lens is something which immediately deterred me from buying – having said that I later bought a GF1 Panasonic and find that the 20mm lens stays on most of the time. David Beckham has one, good enough reason for anyone to buy I suppose(!)

    The Fujifilm Pro 1 (Monty Don has one of those) is more interesting to me, larger sensor and interchangeable lenses – when it was announced it seemed to be an important step forward. I might buy the Pro 2, which doesn’t exist yet but the Pro 1 has a few issues which are bound to get sorted. The new generation of small cameras with large sensors are beginning to be a real alternative to the weighty SLRs. Nice to have both and I nearly always grab the GF1 when we when I am off out but not on a dedicated shoot (which is most of the time!).

Viewing 5 posts - 736 through 740 (of 740 total)